Skip to main content


This is a 5-year US Entry Waiver that we successfully secured for one of our clients on their very first attempt. 



- Five years is the maximum time you can get for a US Entry Waiver; this is a big win for our client.

- What's the secret behind this successful outcome?

- In this blog I'm going to cover our law firm's strategy - so insider tips – that will significantly enhance your chances of getting your waiver approved and hopefully get the longest time period possible. 



Understanding the US Entry Waiver Process

To understand our law firm strategy to maximise your chances of success it's important to understand what aspects of the US Entry Waiver process that are in your control and those that are not.



- A key factor that you can't control is the criteria used by ARO, which is the Admissibility Review Office, when assessing your waiver application.

- Understanding this criteria and how the ARO interprets them is critical to crafting a waiver application that maximises your likelihood of success.



The ARO's Decision-Making Criteria

The ARO's decision-making is influenced by a legal case known as Matter of Hranka, established in 1978.  Using this case, the ARO will evaluate your application on three factors.



- 1/ Seriousness of the Inadmissibility Cause.  This means how severe was the criminality that led to your inadmissibility?



- 2/ Risk to Society.  In other words, what potential risk might you pose if they let you visit the United States?



- 3/ Purpose for Entering the United States: This simply means why do you want to enter the U.S.?  Is it for work and or for leisure purposes.



Now, the ARO will also consider other factors when evaluating your application.  These factors include the nature of your offence, the circumstances that led to it, how recently it occurred, whether it was an isolated incident or part of a pattern of misconduct, and critically, what is the evidence of your reformation or rehabilitation. 

The Secret to Success: Presenting Your Story

The secret to success is this: it's how you present your story.



- While you can't change the facts of your past offenses, you can control how they're framed and presented.



- By tailoring your application to address the ARO's criteria and resonate with their concerns, you'll greatly improve your chances of getting your waiver approved."



Three Key Components of a Strong Waiver Application

Here are 3 things you can do.  

1/ Write a strong Personal Statement:



- You need to write a letter addressing the ARO criteria, highlighting your personal growth, responsibility, and reasons for entering the United States.

- It's important to showcase your understanding, remorse, and rehabilitation, turning past mistakes into a compelling case for approval.



2/ Get Compelling Reference Letters:



- Get reference letters from credible people who can talk about your good character. Each reference should reinforce your narrative of transformation and responsible behaviour.



3/ And third, provide strong Supporting Materials:



- For example, include documents like rehabilitation certificates, community service records, and recognition awards that demonstrate your positive contributions and rehabilitation efforts.



If you focus carefully on preparing these components of your waiver application, you will significantly improve your chances of getting your waiver approved.



https://youtu.be/lab7LoZzK1c https://www.nextlaw.ca/2024/05/21/us-waiver-lawyer-waiver-approval/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Stunt Driving Defence Costs: Why Choosing the Cheapest Lawyer Is the Most Expensive Mistake When Jonathan Cohen of Nextlaw discusses legal representation costs with prospective clients facing stunt driving charges, he consistently encounters the same flawed question: "How much does defence cost?" As Ontario's leading stunt driving lawyer, Jon Cohen has analyzed the economics of traffic defence across thousands of cases and identified a critical reality—the relevant question isn't what you'll pay for representation, but rather what conviction will cost compared to your legal investment. This comprehensive analysis examines the true financial mathematics of stunt driving defence, why block fee structures protect clients, and how choosing representation based solely on price represents the single most expensive decision defendants make. Understanding Block Fee Structures in Stunt Driving Defence Legal representative Jon Cohen exclusively employs block fee arran...
Why Office Location is Irrelevant When Choosing Ontario's Best Stunt Driving Lawyer When facing stunt driving charges under Section 172(1) of Ontario's Highway Traffic Act, many defendants make a critical error that could compromise their defence: choosing legal representation based solely on proximity to their courthouse. Jon Cohen, legal representative at Nextlaw—Ontario's leading stunt driving lawyer—explains why this geography-based approach is not only outdated but potentially harmful to your case outcome. The Virtual Court Revolution Changed Everything Since 2021, Ontario's court system has undergone a fundamental transformation that most defendants don't realize. Court appearances for legal representatives are now conducted one hundred percent online across all fifty-two Provincial Offences Courts in Ontario. This shift to virtual proceedings means that whether Nextlaw operates from its Toronto office at 250 University Avenue or any other location in On...
As a partner at Nextlaw, Ontario's leading firm in handling stunt driving offenses, I've witnessed firsthand the transformative effect of technology on legal defense strategies. My name is Jonathan Cohen, and I want to share how the digital revolution, particularly the adoption of Zoom for court proceedings, has reshaped the approach to handling stunt driving charges. This shift from traditional in-person appearances to virtual court sessions has fundamentally altered the defense landscape, offering broader access to justice for defendants. Navigating Pre-Pandemic Court Appearances Before the pandemic, the norm of physically attending court posed significant logistical challenges, especially for those facing charges far from their residence. The requirement to travel, sometimes across great distances, for court dates added a layer of complexity to the defense process. This was particularly taxing if travel became difficult or impossible due to a suspended license. The Con...