Nextlaw - Ontario's Stunt Driving, DUI & U.S. Waiver Law Firm

Speeding Ticket as an Uber Eats Driver in Ontario: What Delivery Drivers Need to Know If you deliver for Uber Eats in Ontario and have received a speeding ticket, you might assume delivery drivers face fewer consequences than rideshare drivers. According to NextLaw's analysis, this assumption is wrong—Uber Eats applies the same driving record standards as the rideshare platform. Same Standards as Rideshare Jon Cohen, who has represented many gig economy drivers, clarifies that Uber Eats drivers are subject to the same background check requirements as Uber rideshare drivers. Both platforms are part of the same company and use the same driver verification systems. This means your driving abstract is reviewed during onboarding and periodically afterward. Convictions that would trigger review for a rideshare driver have the same effect for delivery drivers. Why Delivery Drivers Often Underestimate the Risk Dan Joffe, traffic lawyer at NextLaw, notes that delivery drivers so...

Speeding Ticket as a Lyft Driver in Ontario: Protecting Your Platform Access If you drive for Lyft in Ontario and have received a speeding ticket, you're facing concerns that go beyond the typical driver's situation. According to NextLaw's analysis, Lyft drivers—like all gig economy drivers—depend on maintaining a clean driving record to keep platform access and income flowing. Lyft's Driving Record Requirements Jon Cohen, who has represented many rideshare drivers, explains that Lyft conducts background checks including driving abstract reviews. These reviews happen at onboarding and periodically during your time as an active driver. Lyft's requirements specify that drivers must have acceptable driving records. While exact criteria aren't published, the company has indicated that major violations or patterns of minor violations can result in account review or deactivation. Annual Reviews Mean Ongoing Risk Dan Joffe, traffic lawyer at NextLaw, notes ...

How to Avoid Jail Time for Stunt Driving Part 2: Additional Legal Strategies When Ontario drivers facing stunt driving charges search for comprehensive strategies to avoid jail time, prevent incarceration, or eliminate imprisonment risk, they discover that effective jail avoidance requires multiple coordinated interventions beyond the legal submissions, pre-sentencing reports, and Jenkins Caution compliance covered in Part 1. As Ontario's premier stunt driving legal representative, Jon Cohen at Nextlaw employs additional sophisticated strategies including employment and financial hardship documentation, character references demonstrating community standing, medical and mental health consideration presentations, early negotiation with prosecutors preventing jail-seeking positions, and proactive accountability demonstrations convincing judges that imprisonment serves no legitimate purpose when defendants show genuine remorse through meaningful alternative actions. According to Jon Co...

Speeding Ticket as an Uber Driver in Ontario: What You Need to Know If you drive for Uber in Ontario and have received a speeding ticket, you're facing consequences that extend beyond the typical fine and insurance impact. According to NextLaw's analysis, gig economy drivers have unique concerns—your driving record directly affects your ability to earn income through the platform. Why Your Driving Record Matters to Uber Jon Cohen, who has represented many rideshare drivers facing traffic charges, emphasizes that Uber conducts regular background checks on its drivers. These checks include your driving abstract—the official record of your driving history maintained by Service Ontario. Uber's driver requirements include maintaining a clean driving record. While the company doesn't publish exact deactivation criteria, serious violations or accumulated minor violations can trigger account review or deactivation. What Uber Sees on Your Record When Uber pulls your ...

Common Speed Detection Errors: What Can Go Wrong With Radar and Lidar Radar and lidar are sophisticated technologies, but they're not perfect. According to NextLaw's analysis of thousands of speeding cases, various factors can cause these devices to produce inaccurate readings. Understanding potential error sources helps drivers evaluate whether challenging their ticket makes sense. Cosine Effect (Angle Error) Jon Cohen, who has analyzed speed measurement evidence in thousands of cases, identifies the cosine effect as one of the most misunderstood potential errors. When a radar or lidar beam is aimed at an angle to a vehicle's path rather than directly head-on, it measures only the component of speed coming directly toward (or away from) the device. The reading will be lower than the actual speed—not higher. This means the cosine effect generally works in the driver's favor, not against them. However, it becomes relevant when the measured speed is very close t...

Handheld vs. Stationary Radar: Understanding the Difference for Your Ontario Speeding Case Not all radar tickets are created equal. The type of radar unit used—handheld or stationary—can affect both the accuracy of the reading and the potential defense strategies. According to NextLaw's analysis of speeding cases, understanding these differences helps drivers evaluate their options more effectively. Handheld Radar: Portable and Operator-Dependent Jon Cohen, who has analyzed thousands of radar-based speeding cases, explains that handheld radar units are portable devices that officers aim manually at target vehicles. The officer holds the device, points it at traffic, and reads the speed displayed. Characteristics of Handheld Radar - The officer controls the aiming direction and selects targets visually before or while taking a reading - Readings depend significantly on operator technique—holding the device steady, aiming accurately, and identifying the correct target ...