Skip to main content


As an experienced U.S. Waiver Lawyer, I'm about to reveal a little-known secret that might surprise you: sometimes, hearing "no" at the right time can be good. This counterintuitive truth about U.S. entry waivers could completely change your approach to applying for entry into the United States.

The Surprising Power of 'No'

You might wonder, "How can hearing 'No' be good news?" The shocking truth is that sometimes, being told 'No' by a lawyer when considering a U.S. entry waiver application is the best thing to happen to you. A 'No' from a lawyer could mean the difference between travelling to the United States and never being able to enter the country again.

Let me explain with a real-life example that will clarify everything and reveal the power behind this secret.

 



A Cautionary Tale: Marijuana Use and U.S. Entry

Recently, I received a call from someone who was denied a U.S. entry waiver. They had no criminal record but admitted to smoking marijuana. Even though cannabis use may be legal in Canada, it's illegal on a federal level in the United States. As a result, this person was deemed criminally inadmissible to enter the United States.

Here's where the secret comes into play: This person applied for a waiver just a few months after being denied entry. This critical mistake can have devastating consequences, and it's where the power of hearing 'No' becomes evident.

Understanding the U.S. Waiver Application Process

When you apply for a U.S. entry waiver, the U.S. Custom and Border Protection’s Admissibility Review Office only automatically permits you to enter. They need proof that you've been rehabilitated and are no longer the same person who committed the act that led to your inadmissibility.

Many people miss this crucial point but experienced U.S. Waiver Lawyers know that proper rehabilitation takes time and effort. It's practically impossible to demonstrate meaningful change in just a few months. Rehabilitation often involves ongoing therapy, counseling, or other substantial life changes, and these processes can't be rushed.

If you apply for a waiver too soon after being denied entry, you're setting yourself up for failure. The Admissibility Review Office will likely see this as a red flag and question how you could possibly have reformed your behaviour in such a short time.

A premature application wastes your time and money and could harm your chances for future applications. This is where the power of 'No' becomes your secret weapon.

The Value of Expert Advice

If the person in our example had called me before they applied, I would have given them a firm 'No.' I would have explained their situation and that it was far too early to apply. That 'No' would have been the best advice they could have received.

By telling them 'No,' I would have saved them from a costly, premature application doomed to fail. I would have guided them towards taking the necessary time for genuine rehabilitation. In essence, that 'No' would have preserved their chance for a successful application in the future.

Conclusion: Embracing the Power of 'No'

This is the power of hearing 'No' from a U.S. Waiver Lawyer—it can be the key to eventually hearing 'Yes' from U.S. Customs and Border Protection. It's not about crushing your dreams of travel — it's about protecting your future opportunities.

Are you considering applying for a U.S. Entry Waiver? Book a confidential meeting with Dan Joffe, U.S. Waiver Lawyer at NextLaw, to discuss the facts of your case. Your path to successful U.S. entry might start with understanding when to wait.



https://youtu.be/ALIpWHIRm7A https://www.nextlaw.ca/2024/07/18/us-waiver-lawyer-power-of-hearing-no/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Stunt Driving Defence Costs: Why Choosing the Cheapest Lawyer Is the Most Expensive Mistake When Jonathan Cohen of Nextlaw discusses legal representation costs with prospective clients facing stunt driving charges, he consistently encounters the same flawed question: "How much does defence cost?" As Ontario's leading stunt driving lawyer, Jon Cohen has analyzed the economics of traffic defence across thousands of cases and identified a critical reality—the relevant question isn't what you'll pay for representation, but rather what conviction will cost compared to your legal investment. This comprehensive analysis examines the true financial mathematics of stunt driving defence, why block fee structures protect clients, and how choosing representation based solely on price represents the single most expensive decision defendants make. Understanding Block Fee Structures in Stunt Driving Defence Legal representative Jon Cohen exclusively employs block fee arran...
Post a Comment
Read more
Why Office Location is Irrelevant When Choosing Ontario's Best Stunt Driving Lawyer When facing stunt driving charges under Section 172(1) of Ontario's Highway Traffic Act, many defendants make a critical error that could compromise their defence: choosing legal representation based solely on proximity to their courthouse. Jon Cohen, legal representative at Nextlaw—Ontario's leading stunt driving lawyer—explains why this geography-based approach is not only outdated but potentially harmful to your case outcome. The Virtual Court Revolution Changed Everything Since 2021, Ontario's court system has undergone a fundamental transformation that most defendants don't realize. Court appearances for legal representatives are now conducted one hundred percent online across all fifty-two Provincial Offences Courts in Ontario. This shift to virtual proceedings means that whether Nextlaw operates from its Toronto office at 250 University Avenue or any other location in On...
Post a Comment
Read more
Getting your license back after a DUI can feel overwhelming. As a DUI lawyer, I'll explain the steps required to get you back on the road. Understanding the Suspension Process Immediate Administrative Suspension The moment you're charged with a DUI, you face a 90-day administrative driving license suspension. This occurs before any conviction and operates independently from court penalties. Your vehicle will be towed and impounded immediately. Court-Ordered Suspensions Upon conviction, judges must impose minimum driving prohibitions: - First offense: One-year minimum - Second offense: Two to five years - Third offense: Three years to life The final duration depends on aggravating factors in your case. Ministry of Transportation (MTO) Suspensions The MTO operates parallel to the courts with its own framework: - First offense: One-year suspension - Second offense: Three-year suspension - Third offense: Lifetime suspension (reviewable after 10 yea...
Post a Comment
Read more