Skip to main content


Do I need a DUI lawyer?



- In almost all situations, the answer is yes. 

- But, the question is the wrong question to ask. Let me explain.



Take our DUI Arrest Test

https://dui.nextlaw.ca

First, let me get the obvious out of the way.



- I am a DUI lawyer, but I will give you unbiased information that I would want to know if I were charged with a DUI.



So the question, do you need to hire a lawyer when charged with a DUI?



- Generally, the answer is yes.

- DUI is a serious charge with serious and potentially life-changing consequences. And it's best to do all that you can to minimize those consequences.



But the better question to ask is, "should I hire a general criminal lawyer or hire a criminal lawyer specializing in DUI?"



- The answer is a no-brainer.

- Hire a lawyer specializing in DUIs is much better than hiring a general criminal lawyer for your DUI case.



Here are the 3 reasons why. 

Specialists are almost always better than generalists



- There are lots of examples where you will go to a specialist.

- For example, dentistry - When you go to the dentist and need a root canal, most time of the time, you'll be referred to a dentist that specializes in root canals

- Or, eye problems - If your doctor sees that you have a problem with your eye, most of the time, they are going to refer you to an eye doctor

- Or, cancer - If your doctor believes you have cancer, your doctor will refer you to a doctor that specializes in cancer diagnosis and treatments

- Professionals refer these cases because they are so in-depth and serious that they need someone who focuses on these problem areas since they can see problems and see solutions that others cannot.

- DUI law is the ONE area of criminal law that requires someone with an in-depth understanding because they will see potential solutions and opportunities for your DUI case where a general criminal lawyer cannot.



DUI laws change frequently, and you need a lawyer experienced in DUI to keep up with those changes



- DUI laws are complex and deep.

- For context, the Criminal Code has more than 60 pages devoted to DUIs compared to murder which has less than 20 pages.

- DUI laws are complex and often change due to something called "case law." Here's what I mean when I say "case law."

- Laws are written, then "tested in court." A Judge makes a ruling whether that law is right or wrong. And the Judge will explain the law to ensure that the law is followed correctly.

- Those rulings by Judges are known as case law. And they explain the law in detail about how the police and the Crown must conduct themselves.

- Think about it this way. More laws (remember, more than 60 pages in the Criminal Code) = more case law = lots of detailed rules to keep up on

- A lawyer who has DUI as their specialty knows case law better and can identify opportunities in your case compared to a lawyer who does not have DUI as their specialty. 



Crowns knows which lawyers are "on their game," which can lead to better outcomes.



- The Crown is the lawyer who will be prosecuting your DUI case

- Now, your lawyer will have to have a negotiation with the Crown about your case

- And the Crowns know how difficult and complex DUI laws are, and their job is to convict you, NOT help you

- When the Crowns are dealing with an experienced DUI lawyer, they know what they are up against and are far more likely to negotiate a better deal because they know that they have no leverage when it comes to specifics of the DUI law.

- And that often will lead to a better outcome, and that outcome can be life-changing



So, to recap



- Yes, it would be best to get a lawyer to deal with your DUI case because of the serious consequences.

- And, it would be best if you got a lawyer specializing in DUIs because that DUI lawyer may get you an outcome that can make the difference between winning and losing your DUI case.



https://youtu.be/zC3bBWu2NI0 https://www.nextlaw.ca/2021/03/30/do-i-need-a-dui-lawyer/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Office Location is Irrelevant When Choosing Ontario's Best Stunt Driving Lawyer When facing stunt driving charges under Section 172(1) of Ontario's Highway Traffic Act, many defendants make a critical error that could compromise their defence: choosing legal representation based solely on proximity to their courthouse. Jon Cohen, legal representative at Nextlaw—Ontario's leading stunt driving lawyer—explains why this geography-based approach is not only outdated but potentially harmful to your case outcome. The Virtual Court Revolution Changed Everything Since 2021, Ontario's court system has undergone a fundamental transformation that most defendants don't realize. Court appearances for legal representatives are now conducted one hundred percent online across all fifty-two Provincial Offences Courts in Ontario. This shift to virtual proceedings means that whether Nextlaw operates from its Toronto office at 250 University Avenue or any other location in On...
Post a Comment
Read more
Challenging a distracted driving charge in Ontario is not a lost cause. With the right strategies, you can successfully defend yourself. Here are the most effective defences that have brought relief to many facing these charges. 1. Insufficient Evidence Officer's Observations The prosecution must prove that you were using a prohibited device while driving. The officer's testimony must be clear and consistent about what they observed. If there are gaps or inconsistencies in their observations, this can create reasonable doubt about your guilt. 2. Emergency Situation Defence Legitimate Emergencies Ontario law recognizes exceptions for emergencies. If you can demonstrate that you were using your device to: - Call 911 - Contact emergency medical services - Respond to a genuine emergency This defence can be valid, though you must provide concrete evidence to support your claim. 3. Technical Device Defence Device Status and Mounting This defence focuses on...
Post a Comment
Read more
Distracted driving has become one of the most significant road safety issues in Ontario and across Canada in recent years. To address this growing problem, the Ontario government introduced Section 78(1) of the Highway Traffic Act, which prohibits using hand-held devices while driving. This article provides a detailed overview of Section 78(1), its implications for drivers, and its impact on road safety in Ontario. Background and Context With the proliferation of smartphones and other mobile devices, distracted driving emerged as a significant concern. Studies have shown that using a phone while driving significantly increases the risk of accidents. In response, Ontario first banned hand-held devices while driving in 2009. Section 78(1) was later introduced to strengthen and clarify these laws. Key Provisions of Section 78(1) - Section 78(1) of the Highway Traffic Act states: "No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a highway while holding or using a hand-held wireless co...
Post a Comment
Read more