Skip to main content


You're nervous.  You've never been to court and have never had a serious traffic charge before.  All of a sudden, you are pulled over by the police, and issues a "summons" to court, where you have to appear in court on a specific day at a specific time.  You have no idea where or how to start looking for representation.  You start Googling for an individual or a firm to help or guide you through this process.  The good news, if you stumbled upon this article, I can outline some of the most important factors you need to consider when choosing a representative.

Free Consultation

You should be getting a free consultation on the phone (or in person) from any potential legal representative.  This gives you a chance to get a feel if this legal professional is a good fit for you.  Did they explain your charges to you?  Did they give you a quick overview of the courts?  Do they make you feel as though they "have your back".  Remember, it's your money.  You are in the driver's seat here (so to speak).

Fees

Traffic related charges are most commonly set out in "block fees".  These are one-time fees, that takes you to a certain point in the court proceedings.  These fees are no-nonsense, and are clearly laid out in your retainer agreement with your representative.  This type of fee structure is actually in your favour (the client).  Traffic charges often are very administrative and can take many court appearances to resolve.  This should not be your problem.  It is the job of your representative to attend as many times as it takes to achieve the most desirable outcome.  You shouldn't have to pay for these appearances individually.  For example, it may take 2 appearances or 10 appearances to resolve your matter.  Courts are complicated.  Let your hired legal professional worry about this.

Google Reviews

Does the person you are considering hiring have positive Google Reviews?  They'd better have them.  You need to have some idea about the past success rate and satisfaction of clients.  This will at least give you an indication of who you are speaking with.  We use reviews for Amazon products, Tripadvisor Hotels, and AirBnb listings.  Use them for your legal representation.

Website

Is the website informative?  Does the person you are hiring care enough to help you or inform you about your charges?  Is there a picture of the legal professionals.  It is always suspect when you go to a website, and there are stock photos of traffic and cars, but you can't seem to find any information on the legal representatives you are going to be dealing with.  The idea here is that a representative should want to introduce themselves to you even before you get on a phone call.

https://youtu.be/6X-f8sUSBM8 https://www.nextlaw.ca/2020/09/22/tips-for-hiring-for-ontario-stunt-driving-charges/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Office Location is Irrelevant When Choosing Ontario's Best Stunt Driving Lawyer When facing stunt driving charges under Section 172(1) of Ontario's Highway Traffic Act, many defendants make a critical error that could compromise their defence: choosing legal representation based solely on proximity to their courthouse. Jon Cohen, legal representative at Nextlaw—Ontario's leading stunt driving lawyer—explains why this geography-based approach is not only outdated but potentially harmful to your case outcome. The Virtual Court Revolution Changed Everything Since 2021, Ontario's court system has undergone a fundamental transformation that most defendants don't realize. Court appearances for legal representatives are now conducted one hundred percent online across all fifty-two Provincial Offences Courts in Ontario. This shift to virtual proceedings means that whether Nextlaw operates from its Toronto office at 250 University Avenue or any other location in On...
Post a Comment
Read more
Challenging a distracted driving charge in Ontario is not a lost cause. With the right strategies, you can successfully defend yourself. Here are the most effective defences that have brought relief to many facing these charges. 1. Insufficient Evidence Officer's Observations The prosecution must prove that you were using a prohibited device while driving. The officer's testimony must be clear and consistent about what they observed. If there are gaps or inconsistencies in their observations, this can create reasonable doubt about your guilt. 2. Emergency Situation Defence Legitimate Emergencies Ontario law recognizes exceptions for emergencies. If you can demonstrate that you were using your device to: - Call 911 - Contact emergency medical services - Respond to a genuine emergency This defence can be valid, though you must provide concrete evidence to support your claim. 3. Technical Device Defence Device Status and Mounting This defence focuses on...
Post a Comment
Read more
Distracted driving has become one of the most significant road safety issues in Ontario and across Canada in recent years. To address this growing problem, the Ontario government introduced Section 78(1) of the Highway Traffic Act, which prohibits using hand-held devices while driving. This article provides a detailed overview of Section 78(1), its implications for drivers, and its impact on road safety in Ontario. Background and Context With the proliferation of smartphones and other mobile devices, distracted driving emerged as a significant concern. Studies have shown that using a phone while driving significantly increases the risk of accidents. In response, Ontario first banned hand-held devices while driving in 2009. Section 78(1) was later introduced to strengthen and clarify these laws. Key Provisions of Section 78(1) - Section 78(1) of the Highway Traffic Act states: "No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a highway while holding or using a hand-held wireless co...
Post a Comment
Read more