Skip to main content


You recently got your Stunt Driving charge in Ontario and the interaction with the officer is fresh on your mind. You are investigating the documents you got - the summons, impound document, notice of 30-day suspension and you are trying to find mistakes.  It's a natural reaction to try to find anything that can help or get the case dismissed.  Let's investigate.

The interaction with the officer when you were charged with Stunt Driving

There are a few factors that clients are concerned about when they are charged with Stunt.  Sometimes the interaction with the officer is calm and pleasant, and other times the tension runs high.  Sometimes the officer places you under arrest while issuing the summons, and sometimes you remain near your car.  Sometimes the officer assists with getting you a ride to your destination after your car is towed, and other times, you are left to deal with this on your own.  There is no set formula.

It is important to understand that a Stunt Driving charge falls mainly to the Radar / Laser and the calibration.  This is the real basis of evidence that the court relies on.  So anything that transpires with the officer, unless it is illegal, would not have much of an impact on your case, unless it CHANGES THE RADAR.  So these interactions with the officer rarely have any impact on your case once you arrive in court.

The officer did not show me proof of my speed

This is NOT an error.  The officer does not have to show you the radar as the road.  They do, however, have to submit all of this data (the radar, the calibration, where they caught you, how they caught you, etc) to the court within a reasonable period of time to the court in the form of evidence.   Once you get this evidence, you can examine it for errors.  However, not receiving this information when you were charged is not an error.

The officer made an error on my impound documents or notice of suspension

The impound and 30-day suspension of your license for Stunt Driving is a "pre-court" penalty.  Small errors here do not generally affect your case. Remember, unless these mistakes affect the radar / laser, they will not have a major impact on the case.

Stunt Driving in Ontario is a strict liability charge

What the heck does that mean?  Strict liability?  In plain words, it means that the court will generally rely on the radar / laser to obtain a determination of guilt. A Provincial prosecutor and a Justice of the Peace does not need much more than the calibrated or paced speed of your car to convict you of stunt.  So the only important error can be found in the radar.

What about my dash-cam?  It does not match up with the radar.  Can I use this?

A personal dash-cam is generally not a recognized, calibrated, timed determination of Stunt Driving.  The court recognizes the Laser / Radar used by the officer.  It sets a standard of evidence by which the court can most often rely.  Trying to tell a prosecutor about your dash-cam reading generally frustrates a prosecutor or officer and is not accepted as evidence.



https://youtu.be/BX6LurU8KTM https://www.nextlaw.ca/2022/09/21/the-police-officer-made-mistakes-with-my-stunt-driving-charges/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Office Location is Irrelevant When Choosing Ontario's Best Stunt Driving Lawyer When facing stunt driving charges under Section 172(1) of Ontario's Highway Traffic Act, many defendants make a critical error that could compromise their defence: choosing legal representation based solely on proximity to their courthouse. Jon Cohen, legal representative at Nextlaw—Ontario's leading stunt driving lawyer—explains why this geography-based approach is not only outdated but potentially harmful to your case outcome. The Virtual Court Revolution Changed Everything Since 2021, Ontario's court system has undergone a fundamental transformation that most defendants don't realize. Court appearances for legal representatives are now conducted one hundred percent online across all fifty-two Provincial Offences Courts in Ontario. This shift to virtual proceedings means that whether Nextlaw operates from its Toronto office at 250 University Avenue or any other location in On...
Post a Comment
Read more
Challenging a distracted driving charge in Ontario is not a lost cause. With the right strategies, you can successfully defend yourself. Here are the most effective defences that have brought relief to many facing these charges. 1. Insufficient Evidence Officer's Observations The prosecution must prove that you were using a prohibited device while driving. The officer's testimony must be clear and consistent about what they observed. If there are gaps or inconsistencies in their observations, this can create reasonable doubt about your guilt. 2. Emergency Situation Defence Legitimate Emergencies Ontario law recognizes exceptions for emergencies. If you can demonstrate that you were using your device to: - Call 911 - Contact emergency medical services - Respond to a genuine emergency This defence can be valid, though you must provide concrete evidence to support your claim. 3. Technical Device Defence Device Status and Mounting This defence focuses on...
Post a Comment
Read more
Distracted driving has become one of the most significant road safety issues in Ontario and across Canada in recent years. To address this growing problem, the Ontario government introduced Section 78(1) of the Highway Traffic Act, which prohibits using hand-held devices while driving. This article provides a detailed overview of Section 78(1), its implications for drivers, and its impact on road safety in Ontario. Background and Context With the proliferation of smartphones and other mobile devices, distracted driving emerged as a significant concern. Studies have shown that using a phone while driving significantly increases the risk of accidents. In response, Ontario first banned hand-held devices while driving in 2009. Section 78(1) was later introduced to strengthen and clarify these laws. Key Provisions of Section 78(1) - Section 78(1) of the Highway Traffic Act states: "No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a highway while holding or using a hand-held wireless co...
Post a Comment
Read more