Skip to main content


DUI Lawyer: Police Must Let You Call For Help, Here's Why
When you're arrested for DUI, understanding your rights can make a critical difference in your case. One of the most fundamental yet often misunderstood rights is your constitutional guarantee to call for legal help. Let's explore exactly what this means for you and how it can impact your case.


Your Constitutional Right to Counsel


Under Section 10(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, you have an immediate right to legal counsel upon detention. This protection activates the moment you're detained, whether at the roadside or police station. This right exists because you're facing:

- Trained law enforcement officers


- Complex legal procedures


- Potential criminal charges

When you're scared and confused, every word matters. This constitutional protection helps level the playing field between you and law enforcement.

Police Legal Obligations


The police have specific legal duties that go beyond simply mentioning your rights. They must:

- Provide phone access


- Inform you about legal aid options


- Explain how to get free legal advice


- Ensure you understand these rights


- Take additional steps if you're impaired

Critical Timing Requirements


Timing is crucial and often where police make critical mistakes. While roadside access may vary based on circumstances, at the police station, your right to call counsel is immediate and mandatory. Police cannot delay your call for:

- Breath tests


- Questioning


- Paperwork

Only genuine emergencies justify any delay, and even brief, unnecessary delays can violate your rights and impact court proceedings.


Your Privacy Rights


Privacy during legal consultation is absolute. This means:

- Complete privacy during lawyer calls


- No police monitoring or listening


- Private bathroom visits with dignity gowns


- Confidential medical conversations


- Protected ambulance discussions

It's important to note that hospitals and ambulances are not "Charter-free zones."


Protection Against Self-Incrimination


Once you request counsel, your rights activate comprehensive protections:

- Police must cease questioning


- No evidence collection until lawyer consultation


- Right to remain silent without consequences


- Protection throughout the legal process

Legal Consequences of Violations


The landmark Taylor case demonstrates the serious consequences of violating these rights. In this case, police collected blood samples from a suspected drunk driver without allowing lawyer contact. The Supreme Court not only excluded the blood evidence but established clear rules:

- Police must actively facilitate counsel contact


- Officers cannot assume access barriers


- Evidence obtained without proper counsel access faces exclusion

Multiple Defense Strategies


Experienced lawyers employ various defense approaches:

- Charter violations


- Technical procedure challenges


- Evidence reliability contests


- Expert testimony


- Reasonable doubt arguments

Take Action


If police violated any of these rights during your DUI arrest – through delayed calls, privacy violations, or premature evidence collection – you may have grounds for defense. Professional legal consultation can help evaluate your case and protect your rights.

https://youtu.be/-HnDJAZEHlE https://www.nextlaw.ca/?p=31242

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Office Location is Irrelevant When Choosing Ontario's Best Stunt Driving Lawyer When facing stunt driving charges under Section 172(1) of Ontario's Highway Traffic Act, many defendants make a critical error that could compromise their defence: choosing legal representation based solely on proximity to their courthouse. Jon Cohen, legal representative at Nextlaw—Ontario's leading stunt driving lawyer—explains why this geography-based approach is not only outdated but potentially harmful to your case outcome. The Virtual Court Revolution Changed Everything Since 2021, Ontario's court system has undergone a fundamental transformation that most defendants don't realize. Court appearances for legal representatives are now conducted one hundred percent online across all fifty-two Provincial Offences Courts in Ontario. This shift to virtual proceedings means that whether Nextlaw operates from its Toronto office at 250 University Avenue or any other location in On...
Post a Comment
Read more
Challenging a distracted driving charge in Ontario is not a lost cause. With the right strategies, you can successfully defend yourself. Here are the most effective defences that have brought relief to many facing these charges. 1. Insufficient Evidence Officer's Observations The prosecution must prove that you were using a prohibited device while driving. The officer's testimony must be clear and consistent about what they observed. If there are gaps or inconsistencies in their observations, this can create reasonable doubt about your guilt. 2. Emergency Situation Defence Legitimate Emergencies Ontario law recognizes exceptions for emergencies. If you can demonstrate that you were using your device to: - Call 911 - Contact emergency medical services - Respond to a genuine emergency This defence can be valid, though you must provide concrete evidence to support your claim. 3. Technical Device Defence Device Status and Mounting This defence focuses on...
Post a Comment
Read more
Distracted driving has become one of the most significant road safety issues in Ontario and across Canada in recent years. To address this growing problem, the Ontario government introduced Section 78(1) of the Highway Traffic Act, which prohibits using hand-held devices while driving. This article provides a detailed overview of Section 78(1), its implications for drivers, and its impact on road safety in Ontario. Background and Context With the proliferation of smartphones and other mobile devices, distracted driving emerged as a significant concern. Studies have shown that using a phone while driving significantly increases the risk of accidents. In response, Ontario first banned hand-held devices while driving in 2009. Section 78(1) was later introduced to strengthen and clarify these laws. Key Provisions of Section 78(1) - Section 78(1) of the Highway Traffic Act states: "No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a highway while holding or using a hand-held wireless co...
Post a Comment
Read more