Skip to main content


Stunt Driving for 15 Seconds? It’s Still Stunt Driving
Many drivers believe a brief moment of excessive speed or a quick passing maneuver shouldn't result in severe consequences. However, Ontario's stunt driving laws under Section 172(1) of the Highway Traffic Act are not forgiving, regardless of how briefly the offence occurred.


Understanding the Law's Strict Application


The Highway Traffic Act makes no distinction between someone who speeds excessively for 15 seconds versus 15 minutes. You've committed the offence once you exceed the threshold - 40 km/h over the limit on roads under 80 km/h or 50 km/h over on roads 80 km/h or higher.


Immediate Consequences


The moment an officer determines you've committed a stunt driving offence, several automatic penalties take effect:

- Your license is immediately suspended for 30 days


- Your vehicle is impounded for 14 days


- You receive a summons to appear in court

These penalties apply regardless of your explanation about passing another vehicle or only speeding briefly. The law operates on a zero-tolerance basis, making no exceptions for temporary infractions.


Long-Term Impact


Insurance Consequences


A stunt driving conviction remains visible on your record for three years from the conviction date. Insurance companies view this offence as a primary risk indicator, often resulting in the following:

- Significant premium increases


- Possible policy cancellation


- Classification as a high-risk driver

License Suspension


The court-imposed penalties are equally severe:

- First offence: 1-3 year license suspension


- Second offence: 3-10 year suspension


- Third offence: Indefinite suspension

Common Misconceptions


The legal system regularly encounters drivers who misunderstand stunt driving charges. A pervasive belief exists that having a clean driving record will shield them from the full force of the law. Others arrive in court convinced their brief infraction deserves special consideration, mainly when the excessive speed lasted only moments. For instance, a driver who briefly accelerates to overtake a slow-moving vehicle or speeds up to avoid a potential collision. Perhaps most commonly, drivers assert that they were merely passing another vehicle safely, believing this justifies their temporary speed increase.

First-time offenders often express shock when they discover that their previously spotless record carries little to no weight in these proceedings. These misconceptions, while understandable, reflect a fundamental misunderstanding of how Ontario's stunt driving legislation operates. The law was designed to eliminate subjective considerations and apply equally to all drivers, regardless of their history or circumstances.


The Legal Framework


Section 172(1) of the Highway Traffic Act is one of Ontario's most stringent traffic laws, deliberately structured to leave no room for interpretation or discretion. The legislation operates on a simple threshold principle - once you exceed the specified speed limit by the designated amount, you have committed the offence.

This straightforward approach means prosecutors don't need to demonstrate how long you were speeding or prove you intended to stunt drive. They aren't required to show that your actions endangered other drivers, nor do they need to present evidence about your driving history. The law's black-and-white nature serves a clear purpose: to eliminate subjective factors and ensure consistent enforcement across all cases. This rigid framework reflects the legislature's determination to combat excessive speeding through absolute deterrence, regardless of the circumstances or duration of the offence.


Financial Impact


The monetary consequences are substantial:

- Minimum fine of $2,000


- Maximum fine of $10,000


- Additional 25% victim surcharge


- Impound and towing fees ranging from $800 to $1,500

Why Duration Doesn't Matter


The law's strict application serves several purposes:

- Deterrence: By removing discretion regarding duration, the law sends a clear message that excessive speed is never acceptable.


- Public Safety: Even brief periods of excessive speed can result in catastrophic accidents.


- Enforcement Clarity: Officers don't need to consider mitigating factors, leading to consistent application.

Looking Forward


Statistics show that stunt driving incidents have increased 130% in recent years. This trend has led to even stricter enforcement and zero tolerance for explanations about brief infractions or passing maneuvers.


Professional Legal Representation


Professional legal representation is not just advisable, it's crucial, given these charges' severity and long-lasting impact. The consequences of a stunt driving conviction extend far beyond the immediate penalties, affecting your mobility, employment opportunities, and financial stability for years to come.

Remember, the law doesn't care if you were only speeding for a few seconds or passing another vehicle. The threshold is absolute, and the consequences are severe. The best approach is to avoid exceeding these limits entirely. This can be achieved by always being aware of the speed limit, using cruise control to maintain a steady speed, and being mindful of your surroundings. Even a momentary lapse in judgment can result in years of consequences. https://www.nextlaw.ca/?p=29294

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

DUI - Blow a 'Warn' or over 0.05. What happens next? - What happens when the Police make you take a roadside breath test and the result comes back as a "Warn”? - First, some important context. - The Police will make you take a breath test if they suspect that you've consumed alcohol while driving or in the care or control of a vehicle. - At the roadside, you'll be asked to blow into a device. - This device will come back with three possible results. - Pass, which means you've done nothing wrong. - Fail, which indicates that your blood alcohol concentration level is above 80.   - At this point, the Police will place you under arrest and will take you to the Police station to undergo further alcohol testing. - The third possible result is a "warn." - That means that the device detected alcohol in your system above 50 but below 80, which would place you under arrest. - However, there are consequences of blowing in this ...
Distracted driving has become one of the most significant road safety issues in Ontario and across Canada in recent years. To address this growing problem, the Ontario government introduced Section 78(1) of the Highway Traffic Act, which prohibits using hand-held devices while driving. This article provides a detailed overview of Section 78(1), its implications for drivers, and its impact on road safety in Ontario. Background and Context With the proliferation of smartphones and other mobile devices, distracted driving emerged as a significant concern. Studies have shown that using a phone while driving significantly increases the risk of accidents. In response, Ontario first banned hand-held devices while driving in 2009. Section 78(1) was later introduced to strengthen and clarify these laws. Key Provisions of Section 78(1) - Section 78(1) of the Highway Traffic Act states: "No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a highway while holding or using a hand-held wireless co...
This is BAD for your DUI Case - In this article, I will explain what increases the seriousness of your DUI case. - This is an important topic because a more serious DUI case will significantly impact your legal process and the outcome you may face. _____________________ ✅   Take our DUI Arrest Test _____________________ ✅   Book a free, confidential call with lawyer, Dan Joffe ____________________ - There’s something called aggravating factors that can impact the gravity of your Impaired Driving, Over 80 or Refusal Breathalyser case. - In plain English, it means there’s evidence surrounding your DUI, which increases the severity of what happened. - Here are some examples of aggravating factors. - Very high blood alcohol readings. - If there were kids in your vehicle. - If you were travelling at a high rate of speed. - If you were driving in an erratic manner such as swerving your vehicle in and out of traffic. - An accident causing property damag...