Skip to main content


DUI Defense: 5 Disclosure Facts You MUST Know To Win
In a DUI case, understanding disclosure can make the difference between winning and losing your case. As a DUI lawyer, I've seen countless cases where seemingly minor details in disclosure documents became the turning point in securing a favorable outcome. Let's explore the five crucial disclosure facts that could be vital to your DUI defense.


Understanding the Basics of DUI Disclosure


Disclosure in DUI cases extends far beyond just the breathalyzer reading. It encompasses all evidence collected by law enforcement from their initial observation of your vehicle onwards. What many defendants don't realize is that even the smallest detail in your disclosure package could provide the key to winning your case. In fact, I've witnessed DUI cases dismissed based on disclosure details that most people would overlook.

The Supreme Court's Stinchcombe Decision and Your Rights


The Stinchcombe case fundamentally changed how disclosure works in DUI cases. This landmark Supreme Court decision requires law enforcement to provide comprehensive documentation, including:

- Breathalyzer maintenance records


- Officer certification documents


- Detailed notes about driving observations

This requirement is so stringent that even a single missing maintenance record could potentially lead to winning your DUI case.


What Evidence You're Entitled To See


The scope of disclosure in DUI cases is broader than most people realize. You have the right to access:

- Officer's notes about your speech, walking, and behavior


- Breathalyzer calibration records


- Police car video footage (if available)


- Officer's training records

Each of these elements is crucial, and the absence of any could significantly strengthen your defense.


Handling Missing Evidence in Your Disclosure Package


It's important to note that initial disclosure packages often lack crucial evidence. Common missing items include:

- Complete calibration records


- Detailed notes about roadside testing


- Officer certification documentation

When evidence is missing, you have the right to demand these records. If law enforcement cannot produce them, it could potentially undermine their entire case against you.


Leveraging Disclosure to Build Your Defense


Think of your disclosure package as a preview of your opponent's strategy in a championship boxing match – you need to understand every detail to mount an effective defense. Experience shows that cases can be won through:

- Identifying problems in breathalyzer maintenance records


- Spotting inconsistencies in officer notes


- Analyzing gaps in documentation

A Critical Warning


Before concluding, here's a vital piece of advice: never provide a statement about your DUI case without first reviewing your disclosure package. Knowledge of the evidence against you is essential for avoiding statements that could compromise your defense strategy.

https://youtu.be/U1tt15GnQCo https://www.nextlaw.ca/?p=29983

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Office Location is Irrelevant When Choosing Ontario's Best Stunt Driving Lawyer When facing stunt driving charges under Section 172(1) of Ontario's Highway Traffic Act, many defendants make a critical error that could compromise their defence: choosing legal representation based solely on proximity to their courthouse. Jon Cohen, legal representative at Nextlaw—Ontario's leading stunt driving lawyer—explains why this geography-based approach is not only outdated but potentially harmful to your case outcome. The Virtual Court Revolution Changed Everything Since 2021, Ontario's court system has undergone a fundamental transformation that most defendants don't realize. Court appearances for legal representatives are now conducted one hundred percent online across all fifty-two Provincial Offences Courts in Ontario. This shift to virtual proceedings means that whether Nextlaw operates from its Toronto office at 250 University Avenue or any other location in On...
Post a Comment
Read more
Challenging a distracted driving charge in Ontario is not a lost cause. With the right strategies, you can successfully defend yourself. Here are the most effective defences that have brought relief to many facing these charges. 1. Insufficient Evidence Officer's Observations The prosecution must prove that you were using a prohibited device while driving. The officer's testimony must be clear and consistent about what they observed. If there are gaps or inconsistencies in their observations, this can create reasonable doubt about your guilt. 2. Emergency Situation Defence Legitimate Emergencies Ontario law recognizes exceptions for emergencies. If you can demonstrate that you were using your device to: - Call 911 - Contact emergency medical services - Respond to a genuine emergency This defence can be valid, though you must provide concrete evidence to support your claim. 3. Technical Device Defence Device Status and Mounting This defence focuses on...
Post a Comment
Read more
Distracted driving has become one of the most significant road safety issues in Ontario and across Canada in recent years. To address this growing problem, the Ontario government introduced Section 78(1) of the Highway Traffic Act, which prohibits using hand-held devices while driving. This article provides a detailed overview of Section 78(1), its implications for drivers, and its impact on road safety in Ontario. Background and Context With the proliferation of smartphones and other mobile devices, distracted driving emerged as a significant concern. Studies have shown that using a phone while driving significantly increases the risk of accidents. In response, Ontario first banned hand-held devices while driving in 2009. Section 78(1) was later introduced to strengthen and clarify these laws. Key Provisions of Section 78(1) - Section 78(1) of the Highway Traffic Act states: "No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a highway while holding or using a hand-held wireless co...
Post a Comment
Read more