Skip to main content


DUI Ontario: The Truth About Plea Bargains



- People charged with a DUI in Ontario want to know, can they beat their DUI?

- And if not, how can they get the best outcome to avoid the harsh penalties that come with a DUI conviction?

- And the answer may be with a plea bargain.

- But, there are lots of misconceptions about DUI plea bargains in Ontario, so let me clarify.



1/ What is a DUI plea bargain?



- A DUI plea bargain is an agreement between the defendant (that's you) and the crown which is the lawyer representing the government.

- In a plea bargain, you agree to plead guilty to a lesser charge that would allow you to avoid a DUI conviction.

- Or you agree to plead guilty to the DUI charge in exchange for a reduced or less severe sentence.

- While DUI defence lawyers will try to get your DUI charge withdrawn, there may be a point where the evidence against you is so strong that the risk associated with going to trial may be too high.

- That risk may amount to a severe penalty that you could have avoided if you had taken a plea agreement.

- And of course, there’s the cost.  

- Taking a DUI case to trial is expensive and very stressful.

- And driving that stress is uncertainty.

- You never know how a DUI case will be interpreted by a judge or jury.

- And ultimately, you never know what the outcome will be and how harsh the penalties may end up for you.

- But why would the crown lawyers agree to a plea bargain?

- And there are 2 main reasons.



2/ First, is because of weaknesses in the crown case



- In Ontario, the majority of DUI cases are resolved through a plea bargain instead of going to trial. 

- This is because there may be significant weaknesses in the government's case against you.

- A skilled DUI lawyer will analyze the evidence and identify any flaws or weaknesses in the DUI case. 

- There may be problems with the breathalyzer test or inconsistencies in witness statements, or there may be serious breaches of your charter rights.

- Your DUI lawyer would use this information during negotiations with the crown to argue that the chances of winning at trial are low. 

- And in these cases, crown lawyers would be motivated to get something out of your case because they don’t want to lose.

- The job of a Crown lawyer is to get convictions, and if they lose cases then that doesn’t bode well for keeping their job. 

- And this reality would likely lead to a favourable outcome for you through a plea bargain agreement.



3/ Second, are limited court resources



- The second reason why so many cases end up with plea bargains is simply the reality of volume.

- In 2021, almost 40,000 people were charged with DUI-related charges in Canada.

- If every DUI case went to trial, our court system would implode.

- Our court system does not have the capacity to handle every DUI case going to trial.

- So the Crown lawyers need to make hard decisions on which case should be pursued and taken to trial.

- And here’s the key.  

- The Crown lawyers only want to take DUI cases to trial in situations where they believe they will win.

- And if they can’t win a DUI case, then they won’t take it to trial.

- A good DUI lawyer will find weaknesses in the evidence and present that evidence to the Crown to convince them not to go to trial because they can’t win.

- And if that happens, the Crown will be motivated to offer a good plea bargain for your DUI case.



https://youtu.be/wpwJ26WPe18 https://www.nextlaw.ca/2023/03/07/dui-ontario-the-truth-about-plea-bargains/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Office Location is Irrelevant When Choosing Ontario's Best Stunt Driving Lawyer When facing stunt driving charges under Section 172(1) of Ontario's Highway Traffic Act, many defendants make a critical error that could compromise their defence: choosing legal representation based solely on proximity to their courthouse. Jon Cohen, legal representative at Nextlaw—Ontario's leading stunt driving lawyer—explains why this geography-based approach is not only outdated but potentially harmful to your case outcome. The Virtual Court Revolution Changed Everything Since 2021, Ontario's court system has undergone a fundamental transformation that most defendants don't realize. Court appearances for legal representatives are now conducted one hundred percent online across all fifty-two Provincial Offences Courts in Ontario. This shift to virtual proceedings means that whether Nextlaw operates from its Toronto office at 250 University Avenue or any other location in On...
Post a Comment
Read more
Challenging a distracted driving charge in Ontario is not a lost cause. With the right strategies, you can successfully defend yourself. Here are the most effective defences that have brought relief to many facing these charges. 1. Insufficient Evidence Officer's Observations The prosecution must prove that you were using a prohibited device while driving. The officer's testimony must be clear and consistent about what they observed. If there are gaps or inconsistencies in their observations, this can create reasonable doubt about your guilt. 2. Emergency Situation Defence Legitimate Emergencies Ontario law recognizes exceptions for emergencies. If you can demonstrate that you were using your device to: - Call 911 - Contact emergency medical services - Respond to a genuine emergency This defence can be valid, though you must provide concrete evidence to support your claim. 3. Technical Device Defence Device Status and Mounting This defence focuses on...
Post a Comment
Read more
Distracted driving has become one of the most significant road safety issues in Ontario and across Canada in recent years. To address this growing problem, the Ontario government introduced Section 78(1) of the Highway Traffic Act, which prohibits using hand-held devices while driving. This article provides a detailed overview of Section 78(1), its implications for drivers, and its impact on road safety in Ontario. Background and Context With the proliferation of smartphones and other mobile devices, distracted driving emerged as a significant concern. Studies have shown that using a phone while driving significantly increases the risk of accidents. In response, Ontario first banned hand-held devices while driving in 2009. Section 78(1) was later introduced to strengthen and clarify these laws. Key Provisions of Section 78(1) - Section 78(1) of the Highway Traffic Act states: "No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a highway while holding or using a hand-held wireless co...
Post a Comment
Read more