Skip to main content


Stunt Driving Charges Ontario: Early Resolution Tips
As a legal representative who has handled countless stunt driving cases in Ontario courtrooms, I've witnessed firsthand how a single court appearance can dramatically impact someone's future. Let me share what happens during these crucial early resolution meetings, often called "spoken to" dates.


The Reality of Your First Court Date


Walking into court for a stunt driving charge can be overwhelming. Unlike regular traffic tickets, you'll find yourself in a much more formal setting, facing prosecutors who handle serious driving offences daily. These aren't simple speeding tickets - under Section 172(1) of the Highway Traffic Act, you're dealing with one of Ontario's most severe driving offences.


What Happens in Early Resolution Court


The Initial Discussion


When your case is called, you'll approach the prosecutor's table. This moment is critical - it's your first opportunity to discuss your case with the Crown. However, many defendants make the crucial mistake of treating this like a regular speeding ticket resolution.

The prosecutor will typically:

- Review the officer's notes about your driving behaviour


- Check your driving record


- Assess any aggravating factors, such as weather conditions or time of day


- Consider your explanation of events

Common Pitfalls During Prosecutor Meetings


I've seen countless individuals damage their cases by:

- Admitting to additional details not in the police report


- Becoming argumentative with the prosecutor


- Failing to understand the legal terminology being used


- Missing opportunities for charge reduction due to lack of legal knowledge

Understanding What's Really at Stake


The Hard Truth About Penalties


Let me be frank - the consequences of a stunt driving conviction are severe. We're talking about:

- Minimum fines starting at $2,000, often reaching $10,000


- License suspensions that can prevent you from driving for years


- Insurance rates that can skyrocket to $10,000+ annually


- Potential employment loss, especially if you drive for work

Critical Moments in Early Resolution


The Negotiation Process


The discussion with the prosecutor isn't just a casual chat. It's a legal negotiation that requires:

- Understanding of legal precedents


- Knowledge of available defences


- Awareness of technical issues with evidence


- Strategic presentation of mitigating factors

Real-World Scenarios I've Encountered


Case Study: The Speed Reading Defense


Recently, I handled a case in which a client was charged with stunt driving for allegedly going 50 km/h over the limit. During early resolution, we discovered that the officer's speed-measuring device needed to be appropriately calibrated. This technical detail, which most defendants wouldn't know to look for, became crucial in negotiations.


The Prosecution's Perspective


Understanding how prosecutors approach these cases is vital. They're looking at:

- The strength of their evidence


- Your driving record


- Public safety concerns


- Court resources and time

Why Early Resolution Can Be Tricky


Hidden Complexities


The early resolution process might seem straightforward, but there are numerous pitfalls:

- Prosecutors may use legal terminology you don't fully understand


- Offers made might have hidden implications


- Time pressure in busy courts can rush important decisions


- Technical defences might be overlooked

Making Informed Decisions


The Risk of Self-Representation


When you represent yourself, prosecutors are limited in how much they can assist you. They can't:

- Give you legal advice


- Explain all possible defences


- Guide you through technical legal arguments


- Advocate on your behalf

Long-Term Implications


Beyond the Immediate Penalties


A stunt driving conviction affects more than just your driving privileges:

- Employment opportunities can vanish


- Insurance companies may refuse coverage


- Travel to the US could become complicated


- Professional licenses might be impacted

Strategic Approaches to Resolution


Building a Strong Position


Successful early resolution often requires:

- Thorough review of disclosure materials


- Understanding of recent legal precedents


- Knowledge of local court tendencies


- Strategic presentation of mitigating factors

Moving Forward


The early resolution process for stunt driving charges is critical to determine your future mobility, employment, and financial stability. While you have the right to represent yourself, the complexities of these charges and the severity of potential consequences make professional legal representation helpful and often necessary for protecting your rights and securing the best possible outcome.

Remember, what happens in those few minutes before the prosecutor can impact your life for years. Make sure you're prepared to handle this serious legal matter with the attention and expertise it demands.

https://youtu.be/D3BEvuRTVl8 https://www.nextlaw.ca/?p=29380

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Office Location is Irrelevant When Choosing Ontario's Best Stunt Driving Lawyer When facing stunt driving charges under Section 172(1) of Ontario's Highway Traffic Act, many defendants make a critical error that could compromise their defence: choosing legal representation based solely on proximity to their courthouse. Jon Cohen, legal representative at Nextlaw—Ontario's leading stunt driving lawyer—explains why this geography-based approach is not only outdated but potentially harmful to your case outcome. The Virtual Court Revolution Changed Everything Since 2021, Ontario's court system has undergone a fundamental transformation that most defendants don't realize. Court appearances for legal representatives are now conducted one hundred percent online across all fifty-two Provincial Offences Courts in Ontario. This shift to virtual proceedings means that whether Nextlaw operates from its Toronto office at 250 University Avenue or any other location in On...
Challenging a distracted driving charge in Ontario is not a lost cause. With the right strategies, you can successfully defend yourself. Here are the most effective defences that have brought relief to many facing these charges. 1. Insufficient Evidence Officer's Observations The prosecution must prove that you were using a prohibited device while driving. The officer's testimony must be clear and consistent about what they observed. If there are gaps or inconsistencies in their observations, this can create reasonable doubt about your guilt. 2. Emergency Situation Defence Legitimate Emergencies Ontario law recognizes exceptions for emergencies. If you can demonstrate that you were using your device to: - Call 911 - Contact emergency medical services - Respond to a genuine emergency This defence can be valid, though you must provide concrete evidence to support your claim. 3. Technical Device Defence Device Status and Mounting This defence focuses on...
Distracted driving has become one of the most significant road safety issues in Ontario and across Canada in recent years. To address this growing problem, the Ontario government introduced Section 78(1) of the Highway Traffic Act, which prohibits using hand-held devices while driving. This article provides a detailed overview of Section 78(1), its implications for drivers, and its impact on road safety in Ontario. Background and Context With the proliferation of smartphones and other mobile devices, distracted driving emerged as a significant concern. Studies have shown that using a phone while driving significantly increases the risk of accidents. In response, Ontario first banned hand-held devices while driving in 2009. Section 78(1) was later introduced to strengthen and clarify these laws. Key Provisions of Section 78(1) - Section 78(1) of the Highway Traffic Act states: "No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a highway while holding or using a hand-held wireless co...