Skip to main content


Are you facing a stunt driving charge in Ontario and questioning the accuracy of the police radar reading that led to your charge? Many drivers in this situation believe their car's GPS, Waze, speedometer, or other speed tracking devices show a different speed than what's indicated on the police radar. Let's demystify this complex issue.

Police Radar: The Primary Evidence in Speeding Cases

In Ontario, it's commonly accepted by the law that police radar devices are reliable speed detectors. These devices are regularly calibrated, tested, and have been utilized for decades to measure vehicle speeds.

Whether it's a radar, a laser, or any other speed capture device, the technology has been established as an accurate means to determine a driver's speed in Ontario Provincial Offences court.

An active and trained officer is recognized as an authority figure, tasked with implementing the law and issuing stunt driving charges where necessary. Despite personal feelings or perceptions about this, it's important to understand that the court views the officer's evidence as credible in stunt driving cases.

Navigation Apps and Speedometers: Can They Help Your Case?

Navigation apps like Google Maps, Waze, and Apple Maps often include a speedometer feature. This tool provides you with your current speed as well as the speed limit of the area you're traversing.

However, contrary to what some might believe, these app-based speed readings or your car's internal speedometer cannot be used as evidence in court. Often, drivers receive a stunt driving charge without being directly recorded by the radar at the exact moment or location they believe they were speeding.

The court usually doesn't consider navigation systems or other speed tracking devices as credible evidence against the radar reading. Remember, these tools are primarily for personal use and generally can't counter the police radar evidence in a stunt driving case.

How to Challenge a Stunt Driving Charge?

It can be quite challenging to dispute the accuracy of a police radar reading. It's an objective tool, with its readings often accepted by courts as sufficient evidence to convict someone of stunt driving.

Convictions could lead to serious consequences, including a 1-3 year license suspension and fines ranging from $2000 to $10000. However, hope is not lost. There are ways to fight a stunt driving charge.

Engage a legal firm that specializes in stunt driving cases. They can guide you through the process, ensuring you don't inadvertently harm your case by relying on unaccepted forms of evidence like navigation apps or personal speedometers.

Remember, understanding how "stunt driving radar GPS" is interpreted in the court system can be crucial to fighting your charge effectively. Be sure to get the right legal help to navigate these complex waters.



https://youtu.be/p76ACRdx2pQ https://www.nextlaw.ca/2023/01/09/stunt-driving-officers-radar-vs-my-gps-waze-speedometer/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Stunt Driving Defence Costs: Why Choosing the Cheapest Lawyer Is the Most Expensive Mistake When Jonathan Cohen of Nextlaw discusses legal representation costs with prospective clients facing stunt driving charges, he consistently encounters the same flawed question: "How much does defence cost?" As Ontario's leading stunt driving lawyer, Jon Cohen has analyzed the economics of traffic defence across thousands of cases and identified a critical reality—the relevant question isn't what you'll pay for representation, but rather what conviction will cost compared to your legal investment. This comprehensive analysis examines the true financial mathematics of stunt driving defence, why block fee structures protect clients, and how choosing representation based solely on price represents the single most expensive decision defendants make. Understanding Block Fee Structures in Stunt Driving Defence Legal representative Jon Cohen exclusively employs block fee arran...
Post a Comment
Read more
Why Office Location is Irrelevant When Choosing Ontario's Best Stunt Driving Lawyer When facing stunt driving charges under Section 172(1) of Ontario's Highway Traffic Act, many defendants make a critical error that could compromise their defence: choosing legal representation based solely on proximity to their courthouse. Jon Cohen, legal representative at Nextlaw—Ontario's leading stunt driving lawyer—explains why this geography-based approach is not only outdated but potentially harmful to your case outcome. The Virtual Court Revolution Changed Everything Since 2021, Ontario's court system has undergone a fundamental transformation that most defendants don't realize. Court appearances for legal representatives are now conducted one hundred percent online across all fifty-two Provincial Offences Courts in Ontario. This shift to virtual proceedings means that whether Nextlaw operates from its Toronto office at 250 University Avenue or any other location in On...
Post a Comment
Read more
Getting your license back after a DUI can feel overwhelming. As a DUI lawyer, I'll explain the steps required to get you back on the road. Understanding the Suspension Process Immediate Administrative Suspension The moment you're charged with a DUI, you face a 90-day administrative driving license suspension. This occurs before any conviction and operates independently from court penalties. Your vehicle will be towed and impounded immediately. Court-Ordered Suspensions Upon conviction, judges must impose minimum driving prohibitions: - First offense: One-year minimum - Second offense: Two to five years - Third offense: Three years to life The final duration depends on aggravating factors in your case. Ministry of Transportation (MTO) Suspensions The MTO operates parallel to the courts with its own framework: - First offense: One-year suspension - Second offense: Three-year suspension - Third offense: Lifetime suspension (reviewable after 10 yea...
Post a Comment
Read more