Skip to main content


Are you facing a stunt driving charge in Ontario and questioning the accuracy of the police radar reading that led to your charge? Many drivers in this situation believe their car's GPS, Waze, speedometer, or other speed tracking devices show a different speed than what's indicated on the police radar. Let's demystify this complex issue.

Police Radar: The Primary Evidence in Speeding Cases

In Ontario, it's commonly accepted by the law that police radar devices are reliable speed detectors. These devices are regularly calibrated, tested, and have been utilized for decades to measure vehicle speeds.

Whether it's a radar, a laser, or any other speed capture device, the technology has been established as an accurate means to determine a driver's speed in Ontario Provincial Offences court.

An active and trained officer is recognized as an authority figure, tasked with implementing the law and issuing stunt driving charges where necessary. Despite personal feelings or perceptions about this, it's important to understand that the court views the officer's evidence as credible in stunt driving cases.

Navigation Apps and Speedometers: Can They Help Your Case?

Navigation apps like Google Maps, Waze, and Apple Maps often include a speedometer feature. This tool provides you with your current speed as well as the speed limit of the area you're traversing.

However, contrary to what some might believe, these app-based speed readings or your car's internal speedometer cannot be used as evidence in court. Often, drivers receive a stunt driving charge without being directly recorded by the radar at the exact moment or location they believe they were speeding.

The court usually doesn't consider navigation systems or other speed tracking devices as credible evidence against the radar reading. Remember, these tools are primarily for personal use and generally can't counter the police radar evidence in a stunt driving case.

How to Challenge a Stunt Driving Charge?

It can be quite challenging to dispute the accuracy of a police radar reading. It's an objective tool, with its readings often accepted by courts as sufficient evidence to convict someone of stunt driving.

Convictions could lead to serious consequences, including a 1-3 year license suspension and fines ranging from $2000 to $10000. However, hope is not lost. There are ways to fight a stunt driving charge.

Engage a legal firm that specializes in stunt driving cases. They can guide you through the process, ensuring you don't inadvertently harm your case by relying on unaccepted forms of evidence like navigation apps or personal speedometers.

Remember, understanding how "stunt driving radar GPS" is interpreted in the court system can be crucial to fighting your charge effectively. Be sure to get the right legal help to navigate these complex waters.



https://youtu.be/p76ACRdx2pQ https://www.nextlaw.ca/2023/01/09/stunt-driving-officers-radar-vs-my-gps-waze-speedometer/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DUI - Blow a 'Warn' or over 0.05. What happens next? - What happens when the Police make you take a roadside breath test and the result comes back as a "Warn”? - First, some important context. - The Police will make you take a breath test if they suspect that you've consumed alcohol while driving or in the care or control of a vehicle. - At the roadside, you'll be asked to blow into a device. - This device will come back with three possible results. - Pass, which means you've done nothing wrong. - Fail, which indicates that your blood alcohol concentration level is above 80.   - At this point, the Police will place you under arrest and will take you to the Police station to undergo further alcohol testing. - The third possible result is a "warn." - That means that the device detected alcohol in your system above 50 but below 80, which would place you under arrest. - However, there are consequences of blowing in this ...
Post a Comment
Read more
Distracted driving has become one of the most significant road safety issues in Ontario and across Canada in recent years. To address this growing problem, the Ontario government introduced Section 78(1) of the Highway Traffic Act, which prohibits using hand-held devices while driving. This article provides a detailed overview of Section 78(1), its implications for drivers, and its impact on road safety in Ontario. Background and Context With the proliferation of smartphones and other mobile devices, distracted driving emerged as a significant concern. Studies have shown that using a phone while driving significantly increases the risk of accidents. In response, Ontario first banned hand-held devices while driving in 2009. Section 78(1) was later introduced to strengthen and clarify these laws. Key Provisions of Section 78(1) - Section 78(1) of the Highway Traffic Act states: "No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a highway while holding or using a hand-held wireless co...
Post a Comment
Read more
This is BAD for your DUI Case - In this article, I will explain what increases the seriousness of your DUI case. - This is an important topic because a more serious DUI case will significantly impact your legal process and the outcome you may face. _____________________ ✅   Take our DUI Arrest Test _____________________ ✅   Book a free, confidential call with lawyer, Dan Joffe ____________________ - There’s something called aggravating factors that can impact the gravity of your Impaired Driving, Over 80 or Refusal Breathalyser case. - In plain English, it means there’s evidence surrounding your DUI, which increases the severity of what happened. - Here are some examples of aggravating factors. - Very high blood alcohol readings. - If there were kids in your vehicle. - If you were travelling at a high rate of speed. - If you were driving in an erratic manner such as swerving your vehicle in and out of traffic. - An accident causing property damag...
Post a Comment
Read more